Interaksi Teknologi dan Tenaga Kerja: Peran Teknologi pada Daya Saing Produk (Studi Kasus Sentra Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Bordir Bangil Pasuruan)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v10i2.717Keywords:
Embroidery industry, Labor, Production competitiveness, TechnologyAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of technology in the production situation for competitiveness in small embroidery industries. It also relates to the analysis of choices for the use of technology and changes in the workforce situation. The study was conducted at the small embroidery industrial center in Bangil, Pasuruan, East Java, Indonesia. Data collection through in-depth interviews with informants business owners and workers. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used in this study. Data is processed and analyzed inductively. The findings are obtained that the technological needs in the production process cannot be avoided due to efforts to improve product competitiveness. The impact of these efforts forced business owners to rethink and manage their technology and workforce needs. The provision of technology is the main skill for workers so that workers also make efforts to improve the quality of embroidery with computer machines and complete orders on time. The implication of this research is expected to be able to provide enrichment in understanding the concept of sustainability of small businesses which is focused on the issue of choice of technology use and labor use.References
Anoraga, P. (2007). Pengantar Bisnis: Pengelolaan Bisnis dalam Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bas, M., & Berthou, A. (2017). Does Input-trade Liberalization Affect Firms’ Foreign Technology Choice? The World Bank Economic Review, 31(2), 351–384.
Chaoji, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2019). Creation Processes for Radical Manufacturing Technology Innovations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30 (7), 1005–1033.
Chiarvesio, M., & Romanello, R. (2018). Industry 4.0 Technologies and Internationalization: Insights from Italian Companies. International Business in the Information and Digital Age, 30(1), 357–378.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the Developing Landscape of Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2, 45–68.
Danquah, M., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2017). Assessing the Relationships between Human Capital, Innovation and Technology Adoption: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 24–33.
Deming, D. J. (2017). The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640.
Feder, C. (2018). The Effects of Disruptive Innovations on Productivity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(C), 186–193.
Flachenecker, F. (2018). The Causal Impact of Material Productivity on Macroeconomic Competitiveness in the European Union. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 20(1), 17–46.
Goos, M. (2018). The Impact of Technological Progress on Labour Markets: Policy Challenges. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 362–375.
Hagsten, E., & Sabadash, A. (2017). A Neglected Input to Production: The Role of ICT-schooled Employees in Firm Performance. International Journal of Manpower, 38(3), 373–391.
Hasibuan, M. S. P., & Hasibuan, H. M. S. P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
ILO (2013). Decent Work Country Profile: Bangladesh. Geneva: ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data.
Jacinto, P. d. A., Ribeiro, E. P., & Cravo, T. (2017). A Closer Look at the Skilled Labor Demand Increase in Brazil, Journal of Economic Studies, 44(2), 294–312.
Mallick, S. K., & Sousa, R. M. (2017). The Skill Premium Effect of Technological Change: New Evidence from United States Manufacturing. International Labour Review, 156(1), 113–131.
Mariyono, J. (2018). Productivity Growth of Indonesian Rice Production: Sources and Efforts to Improve Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1792–1815.
Muhardi, M. & Lies, S. H. (2007). Management of Regional Economics Development. Majalah Ekonomi, XVII(1), 80–90.
Morris, D. M. (2018). Innovation and Productivity among Heterogeneous Firms. Research Policy, 47(10), 1918–1932.
Özçam, A. (2019). The Economic Market Outcomes and Income Distribution when Capital is not Homogeneous. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 1(1), 38–56.
Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive Advantage of Nations: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon and Schuster World Press.
Riyadi, S., & Sumardi, S. (2017). The Impact of Innovation Strategy toward Business Competitiveness of Manufacturing Industry in Surabaya, Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 1(1), 83–89.
Robbins, S. P. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT Indeks (Kelompok Gramedia).
Romão, J., & Nijkamp, P. (2019). Impacts of Innovation, Productivity, and Specialization on Tourism Competitiveness – A Spatial Econometric Analysis on European Regions. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(10), 1150–1169.
Rosenberg, N., & Nathan, R. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schilling, M. A. (2015). Manajemen Strategis Inovasi Teknologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sentosa, E., & Trianti, E. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Bahan Baku, Proses Produksi dan Kualitas Tenaga Kerja terhadap Kualitas Produk pada PT Delta Surya Energy di Bekasi. Oikonomia: Jurnal Manajemen, 13(2), 62–71.
Stojcic, N., Hashi, I., & Orlic, E. (2018). Creativity, Innovation Effectiveness and Productive Efficiency in the UK. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 564–580.
Sumihardjo, T. (2008). Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah melalui Pengembangan Daya Saing Berbasis Potensi Daerah. Jakarta: Fokusmedia.
Wibowo, S. A., & Nugroho, S. B. M. (2018). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Industri Pengolahan dan Efisiensi Produksi pada Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Tengah Tahun 2010-2015. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 33(2), 205–213.
Wiltshire, A. H. (2018). Labour Turnover and Considerations around Work: Temporary Farm Workers in South-Africa. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(1), 2–25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Maksipreneur agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Maksipreneur right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Maksipreneur.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Maksipreneur. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
