Validasi Multitrait-Multimethod Manifest Need Questionnaire (MNQ) Untuk Mengukur Motivasi Berprestasi Dalam Konteks Kerja
Keywords:
Validation, Achievement Motivation, Manifest Needs QuestionnaireAbstract
Validation process psycometrically on a measuring instrument which adapted to difference culture from the original version is an absolute necessity in order its application can be more accurate. The aim of this research is validating psycometrically on Manifest Need Questionnaire (MNQ) as a instrument to measure employee’s achievement motivation in work setting that adapted from American language and culture to Indonesian language and culture. The method used in this research is Multitrait-Multimethod. Validation consisted by constract validity (convergent-discriminant) and internal consistency reliability (alpha-cronbach). Multitrait-multimethod matrix was used on the analysis to identify convergent-discriminant validity (including three comparative scale: Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale, Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivation, dan Forgiveness Scale). The results show that MNQ has validity that can accepted psychometrically (N=211) with the reliability α=0,897References
Agung, I. M. (2015). Pengembangan dan validasi pengukuran skala pemaafan TRIM-18. Jurnal Psikologi, 11(2), 79–87.
Anggoro, W. J., & Widhiarso, W. (2010). Konstruksi dan identifikasi properti psikometris instrumen pengukuran kebahagiaan berbasis pendekatan indigenous psychology: Studi multitrait‐multimethod. Jurnal Psikologi, 37(2), 176–188.
Ariani, D. W. (2013). Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 26–38.
Arogundade, O., & Olunubi, A. (2013). A psychological appraisal of manifest needs as predictors of job involvement among selected workers in Lagos State. 1(5), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.12691/rpbs-1-5-1
Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
Azwar, S. (2013). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barry, A. E., Chaney, B. H., Piazza-gardner, A. K., & Chavarria, E. A. (2014). Validity and reliability reporting practices in the field of health education and behavior : A review of seven journals. Health Education & Behavior, 4(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113483139.
Bhattacharyya, D. K. (2009). Human resource research methods. New Delhi: Excel Books.
Blackburn, R. S. (1981). An evaluation of the reliability, stability, and factor structure of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire. Journal of Management, 7(2), 44–62.
Coolican, H. (2014). Research methods and statistics in psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Courvoisier, D. S., Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., & Cole, D. A. (2008). Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: Development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012812.
Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. 28, 47–53.
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-braud, L., Broeck, A. Van Den, Aspeli, A. K., … Westbye, C. (2014). The multidimensional work motivation scale : Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 00(00), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892.
Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi multivariate dengan menggunakan program SPSS. Semarang: UNDIP.
Heridiansyah, J., & Redjeki, D. P. S. (2012). Manajemen kinerja sebagai media perubahan. Jurnal STIE Semarang, 4(3), 29–38.
Istiqomah, I. (2012). Pengembangan skala forgiveness. Insight, 3(2), 1–14.
Konovsky, M., Dalton, D. R., & Todor, W. D. (1986). The psychometric properties of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 58, 309–310.
Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (2009). Surveys and questionnaire. Yorkshire & the Humber: The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands.
Matsui, T., Okada, A., & Kakuyama, T. (1982). Influence of achievement need on goal setting, performance, and feedback effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.645.
Mayer, J. D., Faber, M. A., & Xu, X. (2007). Seventy-five years of motivation measures (1930–2005): A descriptive analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 31(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9060-2.
Mayes, B. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1998). A multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis of the PRF and MNQ Need Scales. Journal of Management, 9(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 887–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.887.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Exploration in personality. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Omar, K. M., Arbab, A. M., & Abdulrahman, K. M. (2018). Motivation effect on human resource management performance in Bahraini market regulatory authority. Human Resource Management Research, 8(2), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.hrmr.20180802.02.
Özer, P. S., Özmer, O. N. T., & Eris, E. D. (2007). A scale development research on manifest needs. Efge Academic Review, 7(2), 553–571.
Prakosa, H. (1995). Menetapkan validitas konvergen dan divergen dalam matriks multitrait-multimethod (MTMM). Buletin Psikologi, 3(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.13394.
Setyawan, N. F. B., & Sahrah, A. (2012). Peningkatan organizational citizenship behavior pada karyawan melalui pelatihan perjasama. Insight, 10(1), 17–36.
Smith, R. L. (2015). A contextual measure of achievement motivation: Significance for research in counseling. In Ideas and Research You Can Use: VISTAS 2015. United State of America: American Counseling Association.
Solomon, O., & Hashim, N. H. (2012). Employee motivation and organizational performance in multinational ompanies : A study of Cadbury Nigeria Plc. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT), 2(3), 303–312.
Steers, R. M., & Braunstein, D. N. (1976). A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 251–266.
Sugiyono, S. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Supratiknya, A. (2014). Pengukuran psikologis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Terrill, D. R., Friedman, D. G., Gottschalk, L. A., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2002). Construct validity of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79(3), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_09.
Urbina, S. (2014). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Willey.
Widhiarso, W. (2009). Koefisien reliabilitas pada pengukuran kepribadian yang bersifat multidimensi. Psikobuana, 1(1), 39–48.
Wijono, S. (2011). Psikologi industri dan organisasi dalam suatu bidang gerak psikologi sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Maksipreneur right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in Jurnal Psikologi.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Psikologi. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
