HUBUNGAN GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL DENGAN EFEKTIVITAS KINERJA PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DIY

Authors

  • Eni Rohyati & FX Wahyu Widiantoro

Abstract

Objective of this research was to verify the relationship between the transformational
leadership style and work performance among employees. Fifty middle managers were involved
in this research. They were recruited randomly from 5 private universities in Yogyakarta. This
research revealed that those managers’ work performances were positively correlated with
their superior’s transformational leadership style, rxy = .713 (p = .00). A limitation of this
research was related to the accreditation score of the university. In fact, the organization’s
accreditation score reflects the leadership style of the owner / employer. The higher score
indicates that the superior is really appreciated by his / her employees. It seems he / she has
applied the transformational leadership style. Unfortunately, this research sample does not
consider the accreditation score. Therefore the sample was less likely to be homogenous.
Key words: work performance, transformational leadership style.

References

Arnold, K. A., Turner, N. Barling, J., Kelloway, E.K., & McKee, M. C. (2007).Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193-203

Avolio, B.J., & Gibbons, T. (2000). Developing transformational leaders: A lifespan approach. Inc.

Azwar, S. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barbuto, Jr. E. & Cummins-Brown, L.L. (2007). Full range leadership. University of Nebraska-Lecoln Extansion, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resouces

Bass, B.M. (2003). Faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 246-255.

Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (2), 207- 218.

Daft, R. L. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

Danim, S. (2004). Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M, and Donnelly, J.H, Jr. (2012). Organizations. Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Harahap, D.H. (2016). Pengaruh pelatihan supervisi terhadap kinerja first manager pada universitas X di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Vol 12, hal 1-21.

Kuswadi. (2004). Cara mengukur kepuasan karyawan.Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Miner, J., B. (2011). Organizational Behavior. Performance Productivity, 5 th Edition. New York: Random House, Inc.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Setiawan, B. A & Muhith, A. (2013). Transformational leadership. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Soeprihanto, J. (2001). Penilaian kinerja dan pengembangan karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Sukrajap, M.A. (2016). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap kepuasan kerja dan komitmen organisasional dengan dimediasi oleh pemberdayaan psikologis. Jurnal Psikologi Vol 12, hal 22-45.

Yukl, G. (2015). Kepemimpinan dalam organisasi (edisi 7). Jakarta : Indeks

Downloads

Published

2019-11-02

How to Cite

FX Wahyu Widiantoro, E. R. &. (2019). HUBUNGAN GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL DENGAN EFEKTIVITAS KINERJA PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DIY. Jurnal Psikologi, 13(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.up45.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/338