PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT TERHADAP CYBERCRIMES BERBASIS KEADILAN BERMARTABAT
Abstract
Information technology develops very quickly, requiring the state to make regulations so as not to have a negative impact on its nation. Globalization forces one to avoid being in touch with people, both nationals and different nations, both nationally and internationally. The world is getting smaller in your grasp. Therefore, regulations are needed to regulate the traffic of information technology so that they do not rub against each other or create unwanted problems, whether economic, political, social, cultural, defense, security, religious or criminal. As the real world, cyberspace (information technology) has the potential to create cybercrimes.
The Republic of Indonesia as a unitary state in the form of a republic, sovereignty is in the hands of the people and based on the law (rechtstaat) is not based on mere power (machtstaat) must protect its citizens from the negative impact of information technology flows, between cybercrime. Pancasila as the basis of philosophy, outlook on life, the basis of the state, and the source of all sources of Indonesian law must inspire all the laws (rules) in the Indonesian system, including the rules governing crime in cyberspace.
Keywords: legal protection, cybercrime, dignified justice.
References
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, 2009, Filsafat Hukum, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, cet. Kedua.
Darji Darmodiharjo, dan Sidarta, 2006, Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum (Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia), Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Moh. Mahfud MD, 1998, Politik Hukum Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.
Muchsin, 2006, Ikhtisar Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Iblam.
Khambali, M., http://krjogja.com/web/news/read/35222/Reposisi Bermedsos Pasca UU ITE Baru
_______, 2018, “Hak Imunitas Advokat Tidak Tak Terbatas”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, Volume 13, No. 1.
_______, 2014, “Fungsi Filsafat Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, Volume 3, No. 1.
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, 2013, Prinsip-Prinsip Individualisasi Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Sri Soeprapto Wirodiningrat, tanpa tahun, Pancasila Yuridis Kenegaraan, Yogyakarta: Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1988, Mengenal Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Teguh Prasetyo & Arie Purnomosidi, 2014, Membangun Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Teguh Prasetyo, 2013, Hukum dan Sistem Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, Yogyakarta: Media Perkasa.
_______, 2015, Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum, Bandung: Nusa Media.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
