Perlindungan Hukum Notaris atas Kewajiban Menerapkan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa (PMPJ) dan Laporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan (LTKM)

Authors

  • Reynaldo Saputra Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v4i2.1973

Keywords:

Notary, Customer Due Diligence, Suspicious Financial Transaction Reports

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal protection of notaries regarding the obligation to apply the principle of recognizing service users and reporting suspicious financial transactions. This research study focuses on whether the obligation to maintain client confidentiality is absolute when faced with a notary's obligation to implement PMPJ and LTKM. Second, what is the legal protection for notaries who implement PMPJ and LTKM obligations? This research is normative, the approach used is statutory and conceptual, and the legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected using library research.

The research results show that first, the obligation to maintain client confidentiality is absolute as per the notary's oath of office and UUJN provisions. The obligations of PMPJ and LTKM are the obligations of notaries who act based on contractual relationships with service users, selling and purchasing property, managing financial services and managing company accounts, and establishing, purchasing, and selling legal entities which are not the duties of a notary's position. Second, legal protection for notaries who carry out PMPJ and LTKM obligations receive legal protection provided directly by the state. This form of protection is provided by the state to provide a sense of security for the reporter or witness from possible threats that endanger their person, life, and/or property, including their family. Notaries as reporters and/or witnesses also cannot be prosecuted either criminally or civilly

References

Artikel Jurnal

Lawa, Ricky Wie. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Menjalankan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa”. Jurnal Proyuris 3, no. 1 (April 2021): 262-272.

Prayitno, Indra. “Telaah Terhadap Pergeseran Kewenangan Notaris Setelah Terbitnya Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan HAM Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2017 Tentang Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Bagi Notaris”. Acta Diurnal 1, no. 1 (Desember 2017): 116-121. https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/acta/article/view/162/119.

Buku

Haris, Freddy. Notaris Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Lintas Djaja Cetak, 2017.

Lubis, Suhrawardi K. Etika Profesi Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Nurwulan, Pandam, Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa dan Laporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Oleh Notaris. Yogyakarta: Buku Litera, 2023.

Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Dasar-Dasar dan Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2006.

Tesis

Muliani, Nurananda Budi. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pelapor Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Dalam Aplikasi Gathering Reports & Information Processing System (Grips)”. Tesis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2019.

Tan, Hadiawaan. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Selaku Pihak Pelapor Sehubungan Dengan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Notaris”. Tesis Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2019.

Internet

PPATK. “Modul E-Learning 2 Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa dan Pelaporan bagi Pihak Pelapor dan Pihak Lainnya (Bagian 2: Pengenalan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa)”. http://elearning/ppatk.go.id (diakses 1 Oktober 2024).

Rozali, Rais. “Asas-Asas dan Teori Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan”. https://zalirais.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/asas-asas-dan-teori-pembentukan-perundang-undangan/ (diakses 1 Oktober 2024).

Downloads

Published

30-11-2024

How to Cite

Saputra, R. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Notaris atas Kewajiban Menerapkan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa (PMPJ) dan Laporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan (LTKM). Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia, 4(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v4i2.1973

Issue

Section

Articles