MEREFLEKSIKAN PERMASALAHAN DUNIA PENYIARAN 91 INDONESIA MELALUI PENDEKATAN SOSIO LEGAL (SEBUAH STUDI PERBANDINGAN ANTARA UU NO. 24 TAHUN 1997 DENGAN UU NO. 32 TAHUN 2002 TENTANG PENYIARAN )

Puguh Windrawan

Abstract


By raising the differentiation between the Broadcasting Act No. 24 of 1997 with Law No. 32 In 2002, the public policy context of the world of broadcasting of Indonesia will look specifically. With that logic, the direction of public policy context will be seen, whether to refer to the public interest or the public as a whole or refer to their stakeholders (decision­makers on a particular issue) alone. Stakeholders in question here is the broadcast media owners and practitioners. Tlie context of public policy in the broadcasting world rightly can not break away from the interpreting framework of public sphere. Public sphere such as those expressed by Jurgen Habermas, a philosopher who came from Germany, is the ideal base type or region or society where the public together in a democratic framework. The ideal are filled by each community involved in various issues of common problems, and then solve the problem of jointly to control the state and the market. The mass media are in a central position in this regard. Habermas argues that all of this is triggered by a logic framework and the characteristics of the ideal function of the mass media as a supplier of information, disseminates information and facilitates the formation of public opinion. But the rest of the logic is also at least into our thinking together behold the mass media in addition to have the ideal function as described above, also has a function as a commercial institution or business.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Free counters!